ETF Copilot

RUNN vs VTHR: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, RUNN and VTHR overlap 5.8% by weight. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN): US large and mid-cap stocks. Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR): U.S. total market stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where RUNN and VTHR trade against their own history

RUNN trades at 22.1 times earnings, against its own median of 26.1, and is cheaper than 98% of its own 41 monthly readings since 2023.

VTHR trades at 23.6 times earnings, against its own median of 22.2, and is more expensive than 62% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved RUNN and VTHR this week

RUNN rose 1.9% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Factset Research Systems (+8.0%), Tractor Supply (+8.4%) and Visa (+6.9%); Curtiss-Wright (−6.1%) pushed the other way.

VTHR rose 1.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

What do RUNN and VTHR each hold?

What's inside RUNN: Tech 28%, AI 4%.

22% of RUNN is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside VTHR: Tech 40%, Magnificent 7 30%.

33% of VTHR is its ten largest holdings.

How much do RUNN and VTHR overlap? 5.8% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, RUNN and VTHR overlap 5.8% by weight.

96% of RUNN is already inside VTHR.

7% of VTHR is already inside RUNN.

RUNN holds 59 companies and VTHR holds 2,972; 57 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score RUNN and VTHR? 4.8 and 6.6 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores RUNN 4.8 out of 10 and VTHR 6.6 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: RUNN 1.0 and VTHR 7.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

RUNN vs VTHR — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorRUNNVTHR
Growth3.26.7
Value9.64.0
Risk8.76.4
Quality4.37.6
Return1.07.6

VTHR is the cheaper of the two at 0.06% a year

As of October 9, 2026, RUNN charges 0.58% a year, yields 0.54% and holds $412M in assets across 59 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, VTHR charges 0.06% a year, yields 1.01% and holds $6.4B in assets across 2972 positions.

RUNN vs VTHR — cost, income and size
MeasureRUNNVTHR
Expense ratio0.58%0.06%
Dividend yield0.54%1.01%
Assets under management$412M$6.4B
Holdings592972

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “RUNN vs VTHR holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/runn-vs-vthr

  1. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN)
  2. Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks RUNN vs VTHR prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →