QWLD vs URTH: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, QWLD and URTH overlap 66.4% by weight. State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD): Developed market large-mid caps. iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH): Developed-market large and mid caps.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where QWLD and URTH trade against their own history
QWLD trades at 20.7 times earnings, against its own median of 19.4, and is more expensive than 74% of its own last 9 years.
URTH trades at 22.4 times earnings, against its own median of 19.8, and is more expensive than 67% of its own last 9 years.
What moved QWLD and URTH this week
QWLD rose 0.8% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Visa (+6.9%) and Palantir Technologies (+10.8%); Lam Research (−8.2%) pushed the other way.
URTH rose 0.8% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.
What do QWLD and URTH each hold?
What's inside QWLD: Tech 28%, Magnificent 7 13%.
19% of QWLD is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside URTH: Tech 37%, Magnificent 7 25%.
28% of URTH is its ten largest holdings.
How much do QWLD and URTH overlap? 66.4% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, QWLD and URTH overlap 66.4% by weight.
100% of QWLD is already inside URTH.
99% of URTH is already inside QWLD.
QWLD holds 1,221 companies and URTH holds 1,265; 1,217 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score QWLD and URTH? 5.5 and 6.2 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores QWLD 5.5 out of 10 and URTH 6.2 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: QWLD 4.1 and URTH 6.6.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | QWLD | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1 | 6.6 |
| Value | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| Risk | 8.8 | 6.9 |
| Quality | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| Return | 5.6 | 7.1 |
URTH is the cheaper of the two at 0.24% a year
As of October 9, 2026, QWLD charges 0.30% a year, yields 1.78% and holds $175M in assets across 1221 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, URTH charges 0.24% a year, yields 1.36% and holds $8.3B in assets across 1265 positions.
| Measure | QWLD | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.24% |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 1.36% |
| Assets under management | $175M | $8.3B |
| Holdings | 1221 | 1265 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “QWLD vs URTH holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/qwld-vs-urth
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks QWLD vs URTH prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →