QLD vs SSO: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, QLD and SSO overlap 58.5% by weight. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD): Leveraged market exposure. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO): Leveraged S&P 500 exposure.
Updated October 28, 2026
How much do QLD and SSO overlap? 58.5% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, QLD and SSO overlap 58.5% by weight.
94% of QLD is already inside SSO.
64% of SSO is already inside QLD.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score QLD and SSO? 7.1 and 6.5 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores QLD 7.1 out of 10 and SSO 6.5 out of 10.
They differ most on Value: QLD 5.9 and SSO 3.6.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | QLD | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1 | 7.7 |
| Value | 5.9 | 3.6 |
| Risk | 0.3 | 0.9 |
| Quality | 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Return | 9.5 | 9.4 |
SSO is the cheaper of the two at 0.88% a year
As of October 28, 2026, QLD charges 0.96% a year, yields 0.10% and holds $14.3B in assets.
As of October 28, 2026, SSO charges 0.88% a year, yields 0.67% and holds $8.6B in assets.
| Measure | QLD | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.88% |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.67% |
| Assets under management | $14.3B | $8.6B |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “QLD vs SSO holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/qld-vs-sso
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks QLD vs SSO prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →