SSO vs TQQQ: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores SSO 5.0 against TQQQ 6.7 out of 10. ProShares - Ultra S&P500 (SSO): 2x daily S&P 500 exposure. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ): 3x Nasdaq-100 exposure.
Updated September 11, 2026
How does ETF Copilot score SSO and TQQQ?
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores SSO 5.0 out of 10 and TQQQ 6.7 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: SSO 3.0 and TQQQ 6.4.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | SSO | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| Valuation | 2.2 | — |
| Risk | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| Quality | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Return | 9.4 | 9.6 |
SSO is the cheaper of the two at 0.88% a year
As of September 11, 2026, SSO charges 0.88% a year, yields 1.10% and holds $8.9B in assets.
As of September 11, 2026, TQQQ charges 0.97% a year, yields 0.64% and holds $35.8B in assets.
| Measure | SSO | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.88% | 0.97% |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.64% |
| Assets under management | $8.9B | $35.8B |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
What moved SSO and TQQQ this week
SSO fell 2.4% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.
TQQQ fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “SSO vs TQQQ holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/sso-vs-tqqq
Register free to unlock SSO vs TQQQ prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.
Register free →