QLD vs UPRO: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores QLD 5.8 against UPRO 5.6 out of 10. ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD): 2x daily tech exposure. ProShares - UltraPro S&P500 (UPRO): S&P 500 leveraged.

Updated September 11, 2026

How does ETF Copilot score QLD and UPRO?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores QLD 5.8 out of 10 and UPRO 5.6 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: QLD 6.4 and UPRO 3.0.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

QLD vs UPRO — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	QLD	UPRO
Growth	6.4	3.0
Valuation	1.6	—
Risk	0.3	0.2
Quality	9.2	8.8
Return	9.6	9.6

UPRO is the cheaper of the two at 0.89% a year

As of September 11, 2026, QLD charges 0.98% a year, yields 0.64% and holds $14.1B in assets.

As of September 11, 2026, UPRO charges 0.89% a year, yields 1.10% and holds $5.4B in assets.

QLD vs UPRO — cost, income and size
Measure	QLD	UPRO
Expense ratio	0.98%	0.89%
Dividend yield	0.64%	1.10%
Assets under management	$14.1B	$5.4B

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

What moved QLD this week

QLD fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “QLD vs UPRO holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/qld-vs-upro