LIT vs BATT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, LIT and BATT overlap 29.5% by weight. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT): Owns a focused strategy. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT): Lithium and battery tech firms.
Updated October 28, 2026
Where LIT and BATT trade against their own history
LIT trades at 17.1 times earnings, against its own median of 23.6, and is cheaper than 74% of its own last 9 years.
BATT trades at 17.1 times earnings, against its own median of 20.8, and is cheaper than 69% of its own last 8 years.
What moved LIT and BATT this week
LIT fell 0.8% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Naura Technology (−8.7%), LG Energy Solution (−6.4%) and Samsung SDI (−4.7%); EVE Energy (+11.5%) pushed the other way.
BATT fell 0.9% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Freeport-McMoRan (−3.3%), Bloom Energy (−4.4%) and Ecopro BM (−11.3%); Tesla (+4.6%) pushed the other way.
What do LIT and BATT each hold?
What's inside LIT: Tech 24%, Memory 6%.
69% of LIT is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside BATT: Magnificent 7 10%, Tech 6%.
49% of BATT is its ten largest holdings.
How much do LIT and BATT overlap? 29.5% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, LIT and BATT overlap 29.5% by weight.
47% of LIT is already inside BATT.
37% of BATT is already inside LIT.
LIT holds 40 companies and BATT holds 53; 14 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score LIT and BATT? 4.7 and 3.9 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores LIT 4.7 out of 10 and BATT 3.9 out of 10.
They differ most on Return: LIT 3.0 and BATT 0.9.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | LIT | BATT |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5 | 7.4 |
| Value | 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Risk | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Quality | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| Return | 3.0 | 0.9 |
BATT is the cheaper of the two at 0.59% a year
As of October 28, 2026, LIT charges 0.75% a year, yields 0.78% and holds $1.2B in assets across 40 positions.
As of October 28, 2026, BATT charges 0.59% a year, yields 1.96% and holds $99M in assets across 53 positions.
| Measure | LIT | BATT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.96% |
| Assets under management | $1.2B | $99M |
| Holdings | 40 | 53 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “LIT vs BATT holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/lit-vs-batt
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks LIT vs BATT prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →