LIT vs BATT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of September 11, 2026, LIT and BATT overlap 29.1% by weight. Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT): Lithium cycle and battery producers. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT): Lithium and battery tech firms.
Updated September 11, 2026
How much do LIT and BATT overlap?
As of September 11, 2026, LIT and BATT overlap 29.1% by weight.
46% of LIT is already inside BATT.
36% of BATT is already inside LIT.
LIT holds 41 companies and BATT holds 54; 15 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score LIT and BATT?
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores LIT 5.3 out of 10 and BATT 4.9 out of 10.
They differ most on Return: LIT 4.3 and BATT 2.4.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | LIT | BATT |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Valuation | 8.6 | 7.4 |
| Risk | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| Quality | 1.2 | 2.9 |
| Return | 4.3 | 2.4 |
BATT is the cheaper of the two at 0.59% a year
As of September 11, 2026, LIT charges 0.75% a year, yields 1.85% and holds $1.5B in assets across 41 positions.
As of September 11, 2026, BATT charges 0.59% a year, yields 1.41% and holds $126M in assets across 54 positions.
| Measure | LIT | BATT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.41% |
| Assets under management | $1.5B | $126M |
| Holdings | 41 | 54 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Where LIT and BATT trade against their own history
LIT trades at 20.3 times earnings, against its own median of 22.6, and is cheaper than 61% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
BATT trades at 19.9 times earnings, against its own median of 20.0, and is cheaper than 53% of its own 100 monthly readings since 2018.
What moved LIT and BATT this week
LIT fell 4.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Rio Tinto (−2.8%), Albemarle (−11.1%) and Pilbara Minerals (−13.2%); Samsung SDI (+2.2%) pushed the other way.
BATT fell 4.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were BHP (−4.7%), Contemporary Amperex Tech (−5.3%) and BYD (−6.8%); Bloom Energy (+17.1%) pushed the other way.
What do LIT and BATT each hold?
What's inside LIT: Tech 18%, Memory 6%.
66% of LIT is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside BATT: Magnificent 7 7%, Tech 5%.
46% of BATT is its ten largest holdings.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “LIT vs BATT holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/lit-vs-batt
Register free to unlock LIT vs BATT prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.
Register free →