LIT vs TAN: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, LIT and TAN overlap 0.0% by weight. Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT): Lithium cycle and battery producers. Invesco Solar ETF (TAN): Global solar energy companies.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do LIT and TAN overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, LIT and TAN overlap 0.0% by weight.

0% of LIT is already inside TAN.

0% of TAN is already inside LIT.

LIT holds 41 companies and TAN holds 35; 0 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score LIT and TAN?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores LIT 5.3 out of 10 and TAN 4.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Valuation: LIT 8.6 and TAN 5.4.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

LIT vs TAN — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	LIT	TAN
Growth	9.9	8.6
Valuation	8.6	5.4
Risk	0.9	0.2
Quality	1.2	2.4
Return	4.3	1.9

TAN is the cheaper of the two at 0.70% a year

As of September 11, 2026, LIT charges 0.75% a year, yields 1.85% and holds $1.5B in assets across 41 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, TAN charges 0.70% a year, yields 0.66% and holds $1.0B in assets across 35 positions.

LIT vs TAN — cost, income and size
Measure	LIT	TAN
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.70%
Dividend yield	1.85%	0.66%
Assets under management	$1.5B	$1.0B
Holdings	41	35

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where LIT and TAN trade against their own history

LIT trades at 20.3 times earnings, against its own median of 22.6, and is cheaper than 61% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

TAN trades at 21.6 times earnings, against its own median of 16.6, and is more expensive than 76% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved LIT and TAN this week

LIT fell 4.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Rio Tinto (−2.8%), Albemarle (−11.1%) and Pilbara Minerals (−13.2%); Samsung SDI (+2.2%) pushed the other way.

TAN fell 1.2% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Doral Group Renewable Energy Resou (−11.4%), Enlight Renewable Energy (−4.2%) and Hannon Armstrong Sustainable (−6.2%); Solaria Energia y Medio Ambi (+10.8%) pushed the other way.

What do LIT and TAN each hold?

What's inside LIT: Tech 18%, Memory 6%.

66% of LIT is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside TAN: Tech 11%, Semiconductors 2%.

57% of TAN is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “LIT vs TAN holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/lit-vs-tan