ICLN vs LIT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, ICLN and LIT overlap 0.0% by weight. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN): Global clean energy stocks. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT): Owns a focused strategy.
Updated October 28, 2026
Where ICLN and LIT trade against their own history
ICLN trades at 18.7 times earnings, against its own median of 17.7, and is more expensive than 57% of its own last 9 years.
LIT trades at 17.1 times earnings, against its own median of 23.6, and is cheaper than 74% of its own last 9 years.
What moved ICLN and LIT this week
ICLN fell 4.5% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Axia Energia (−22.4%), Equatorial Energia (−34.0%) and Enphase Energy (−21.9%); Iberdrola (+1.4%) pushed the other way.
LIT fell 0.8% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Naura Technology (−8.7%), LG Energy Solution (−6.4%) and Samsung SDI (−4.7%); EVE Energy (+11.5%) pushed the other way.
What do ICLN and LIT each hold?
What's inside ICLN: Tech 2%, Semiconductors 1%.
52% of ICLN is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside LIT: Tech 24%, Memory 6%.
69% of LIT is its ten largest holdings.
How much do ICLN and LIT overlap? 0.0% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, ICLN and LIT overlap 0.0% by weight.
0% of ICLN is already inside LIT.
0% of LIT is already inside ICLN.
ICLN holds 122 companies and LIT holds 40; 0 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score ICLN and LIT? 2.2 and 4.7 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ICLN 2.2 out of 10 and LIT 4.7 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: ICLN 1.3 and LIT 8.5.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | ICLN | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3 | 8.5 |
| Value | 5.1 | 8.6 |
| Risk | 1.1 | 0.5 |
| Quality | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Return | 1.1 | 3.0 |
ICLN is the cheaper of the two at 0.38% a year
As of October 28, 2026, ICLN charges 0.38% a year, yields 1.20% and holds $2.0B in assets across 122 positions.
As of October 28, 2026, LIT charges 0.75% a year, yields 0.78% and holds $1.2B in assets across 40 positions.
| Measure | ICLN | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 0.75% |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 0.78% |
| Assets under management | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Holdings | 122 | 40 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “ICLN vs LIT holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/icln-vs-lit
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ICLN vs LIT prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →