ICLN vs LIT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, ICLN and LIT overlap 0.0% by weight. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN): Global clean energy stocks. Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT): Lithium cycle and battery producers.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do ICLN and LIT overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, ICLN and LIT overlap 0.0% by weight.

0% of ICLN is already inside LIT.

0% of LIT is already inside ICLN.

ICLN holds 120 companies and LIT holds 41; 1 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ICLN and LIT?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ICLN 3.9 out of 10 and LIT 5.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Valuation: ICLN 3.2 and LIT 8.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ICLN vs LIT — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorICLNLIT
Growth8.99.9
Valuation3.28.6
Risk1.00.9
Quality3.11.2
Return2.04.3

ICLN is the cheaper of the two at 0.38% a year

As of September 11, 2026, ICLN charges 0.38% a year, yields 1.68% and holds $2.1B in assets across 120 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, LIT charges 0.75% a year, yields 1.85% and holds $1.5B in assets across 41 positions.

ICLN vs LIT — cost, income and size
MeasureICLNLIT
Expense ratio0.38%0.75%
Dividend yield1.68%1.85%
Assets under management$2.1B$1.5B
Holdings12041

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where ICLN and LIT trade against their own history

ICLN trades at 22.3 times earnings, against its own median of 16.2, and is more expensive than 86% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

LIT trades at 20.3 times earnings, against its own median of 22.6, and is cheaper than 61% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved ICLN and LIT this week

ICLN rose 1.6% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Bloom Energy (+17.1%), Doosan Fuel Cell (+26.5%) and CS Wind (+16.3%); Suzlon Energy (−5.2%) pushed the other way.

LIT fell 4.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Rio Tinto (−2.8%), Albemarle (−11.1%) and Pilbara Minerals (−13.2%); Samsung SDI (+2.2%) pushed the other way.

What do ICLN and LIT each hold?

What's inside ICLN: Tech 9%, Semiconductors 2%.

51% of ICLN is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside LIT: Tech 18%, Memory 6%.

66% of LIT is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ICLN vs LIT holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/icln-vs-lit

  1. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN)
  2. Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT)

Register free to unlock ICLN vs LIT prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →