ETF Copilot

JHML vs POWA: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, JHML and POWA overlap 9.0% by weight. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML): U.S. large-cap stocks. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA): Stable gross margin US stocks

Updated October 9, 2026

Where JHML and POWA trade against their own history

JHML trades at 22.7 times earnings, against its own median of 20.9, and is more expensive than 63% of its own last 9 years.

POWA trades at 22.4 times earnings, against its own median of 23.4, and is cheaper than 67% of its own last 9 years.

What moved JHML and POWA this week

JHML rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Amazon.com (+4.3%), Microsoft (+3.4%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

POWA rose 1.6% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Autodesk (+11.0%), Intuitive Surgical (+8.2%) and GoDaddy (+7.3%); NXP Semiconductors (−6.6%) pushed the other way.

What do JHML and POWA each hold?

What's inside JHML: Tech 34%, Magnificent 7 21%.

25% of JHML is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside POWA: Tech 25%, Semiconductors 4%.

23% of POWA is its ten largest holdings.

How much do JHML and POWA overlap? 9.0% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, JHML and POWA overlap 9.0% by weight.

10% of JHML is already inside POWA.

100% of POWA is already inside JHML.

JHML holds 775 companies and POWA holds 50; 50 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score JHML and POWA? 6.3 and 5.7 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores JHML 6.3 out of 10 and POWA 5.7 out of 10.

They differ most on Value: JHML 3.4 and POWA 8.7.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

JHML vs POWA — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorJHMLPOWA
Growth6.24.1
Value3.48.7
Risk7.59.2
Quality7.25.0
Return7.13.4

JHML is the cheaper of the two at 0.29% a year

As of October 9, 2026, JHML charges 0.29% a year, yields 0.93% and holds $1.2B in assets across 775 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, POWA charges 0.40% a year, yields 0.96% and holds $168M in assets across 50 positions.

JHML vs POWA — cost, income and size
MeasureJHMLPOWA
Expense ratio0.29%0.40%
Dividend yield0.93%0.96%
Assets under management$1.2B$168M
Holdings77550

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “JHML vs POWA holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/jhml-vs-powa

  1. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML)
  2. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks JHML vs POWA prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →