ETF Copilot

IWV vs RUNN: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, IWV and RUNN overlap 5.6% by weight. iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV): U.S. total market index. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN): US large and mid-cap stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where IWV and RUNN trade against their own history

IWV trades at 24.1 times earnings, against its own median of 22.2, and is more expensive than 63% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.

RUNN trades at 22.1 times earnings, against its own median of 26.1, and is cheaper than 98% of its own 41 monthly readings since 2023.

What moved IWV and RUNN this week

IWV rose 1.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

RUNN rose 1.9% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Factset Research Systems (+8.0%), Tractor Supply (+8.4%) and Visa (+6.9%); Curtiss-Wright (−6.1%) pushed the other way.

What do IWV and RUNN each hold?

What's inside IWV: Tech 43%, Magnificent 7 31%.

35% of IWV is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside RUNN: Tech 28%, AI 4%.

22% of RUNN is its ten largest holdings.

How much do IWV and RUNN overlap? 5.6% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, IWV and RUNN overlap 5.6% by weight.

6% of IWV is already inside RUNN.

96% of RUNN is already inside IWV.

IWV holds 2,587 companies and RUNN holds 59; 57 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score IWV and RUNN? 6.5 and 4.8 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IWV 6.5 out of 10 and RUNN 4.8 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: IWV 7.6 and RUNN 1.0.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

IWV vs RUNN — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorIWVRUNN
Growth7.13.2
Value3.19.6
Risk6.58.7
Quality7.84.3
Return7.61.0

IWV is the cheaper of the two at 0.20% a year

As of October 9, 2026, IWV charges 0.20% a year, yields 0.86% and holds $20.5B in assets across 2587 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, RUNN charges 0.58% a year, yields 0.54% and holds $412M in assets across 59 positions.

IWV vs RUNN — cost, income and size
MeasureIWVRUNN
Expense ratio0.20%0.58%
Dividend yield0.86%0.54%
Assets under management$20.5B$412M
Holdings258759

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “IWV vs RUNN holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iwv-vs-runn

  1. iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV)
  2. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks IWV vs RUNN prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →