IWB vs ONEO: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, IWB and ONEO overlap 31.8% by weight. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB): Russell 1000 index. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO): US large-cap momentum tilt
Updated October 9, 2026
Where IWB and ONEO trade against their own history
IWB trades at 24.4 times earnings, against its own median of 22.4, and is more expensive than 63% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
ONEO trades at 17.8 times earnings, against its own median of 17.8, and is more expensive than 51% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved IWB and ONEO this week
IWB rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.
ONEO rose 1.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were PTC (+35.0%), Humana (+11.2%) and Cboe (+12.1%); Skyworks Solutions (−10.2%) pushed the other way.
What do IWB and ONEO each hold?
What's inside IWB: Tech 44%, Magnificent 7 32%.
37% of IWB is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside ONEO: Tech 17%, Semiconductors 4%.
6% of ONEO is its ten largest holdings.
How much do IWB and ONEO overlap? 31.8% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, IWB and ONEO overlap 31.8% by weight.
95% of IWB is already inside ONEO.
100% of ONEO is already inside IWB.
IWB holds 1,023 companies and ONEO holds 929; 927 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score IWB and ONEO? 6.7 and 5.3 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IWB 6.7 out of 10 and ONEO 5.3 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: IWB 7.3 and ONEO 2.7.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | IWB | ONEO |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3 | 2.7 |
| Value | 3.1 | 6.6 |
| Risk | 6.6 | 7.3 |
| Quality | 8.1 | 4.8 |
| Return | 7.8 | 6.1 |
IWB is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year
As of October 9, 2026, IWB charges 0.15% a year, yields 0.90% and holds $49.6B in assets across 1023 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, ONEO charges 0.20% a year, yields 1.25% and holds $30M in assets across 929 positions.
| Measure | IWB | ONEO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.25% |
| Assets under management | $49.6B | $30M |
| Holdings | 1023 | 929 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “IWB vs ONEO holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iwb-vs-oneo
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks IWB vs ONEO prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →