ETF Copilot

IWB vs KONG: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, IWB and KONG overlap 16.6% by weight. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB): Russell 1000 index. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG): Low-debt, low-volatility global stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where IWB and KONG trade against their own history

IWB trades at 24.4 times earnings, against its own median of 22.4, and is more expensive than 63% of its own last 9 years.

KONG trades at 28.0 times earnings, against its own median of 22.1, and is more expensive than 98% of its own last 5 years.

What moved IWB and KONG this week

IWB rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

KONG rose 2.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Cboe (+12.1%), ServiceNow (+4.8%) and F5 Networks (+5.7%); Monolithic Power Systems (−3.7%) pushed the other way.

What do IWB and KONG each hold?

What's inside IWB: Tech 44%, Magnificent 7 32%.

37% of IWB is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside KONG: Tech 38%, AI 18%.

44% of KONG is its ten largest holdings.

How much do IWB and KONG overlap? 16.6% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, IWB and KONG overlap 16.6% by weight.

20% of IWB is already inside KONG.

100% of KONG is already inside IWB.

IWB holds 1,023 companies and KONG holds 34; 34 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score IWB and KONG? 6.7 and 5.6 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IWB 6.7 out of 10 and KONG 5.6 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: IWB 7.8 and KONG 2.7.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

IWB vs KONG — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorIWBKONG
Growth7.37.2
Value3.10.2
Risk6.69.5
Quality8.19.2
Return7.82.7

IWB is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of October 9, 2026, IWB charges 0.15% a year, yields 0.90% and holds $49.6B in assets across 1023 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, KONG charges 0.89% a year, yields 0.33% and holds $23M in assets across 34 positions.

IWB vs KONG — cost, income and size
MeasureIWBKONG
Expense ratio0.15%0.89%
Dividend yield0.90%0.33%
Assets under management$49.6B$23M
Holdings102334

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “IWB vs KONG holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iwb-vs-kong

  1. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB)
  2. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks IWB vs KONG prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →