ETF Copilot

FNDB vs XMLV: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and XMLV overlap 1.4% by weight. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV): Low-volatility mid-cap stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where FNDB and XMLV trade against their own history

FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

XMLV trades at 14.5 times earnings, against its own median of 18.8, and is cheaper than 97% of its own last 9 years.

What moved FNDB this week

FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.

What do FNDB and XMLV each hold?

What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.

21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.

19% of XMLV is its ten largest holdings.

How much do FNDB and XMLV overlap? 1.4% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and XMLV overlap 1.4% by weight.

1% of FNDB is already inside XMLV.

100% of XMLV is already inside FNDB.

FNDB holds 1,618 companies and XMLV holds 80; 80 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FNDB and XMLV? 5.6 and 4.7 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDB 5.6 out of 10 and XMLV 4.7 out of 10.

They differ most on Value: FNDB 3.9 and XMLV 9.8.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FNDB vs XMLV — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorFNDBXMLV
Growth2.90.8
Value3.99.8
Risk8.69.2
Quality4.94.7
Return7.82.1

FNDB and XMLV both charge 0.25% a year

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, XMLV charges 0.25% a year, yields 3.16% and holds $696M in assets across 80 positions.

FNDB vs XMLV — cost, income and size
MeasureFNDBXMLV
Expense ratio0.25%0.25%
Dividend yield1.46%3.16%
Assets under management$1.5B$696M
Holdings161880

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FNDB vs XMLV holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndb-vs-xmlv

  1. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB)
  2. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks FNDB vs XMLV prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →