FNDB vs SPVM: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and SPVM overlap 19.4% by weight. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals. Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM): U.S. value and momentum stocks.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where FNDB and SPVM trade against their own history
FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.
SPVM trades at 14.0 times earnings, against its own median of 13.0, and is more expensive than 65% of its own last 9 years.
What moved FNDB and SPVM this week
FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.
SPVM rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Marathon Petroleum (+7.7%), Valero Energy (+6.8%) and Phillips 66 (+5.1%); Verizon Communications (−9.3%) pushed the other way.
What do FNDB and SPVM each hold?
What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.
21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.
17% of SPVM is its ten largest holdings.
How much do FNDB and SPVM overlap? 19.4% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and SPVM overlap 19.4% by weight.
22% of FNDB is already inside SPVM.
100% of SPVM is already inside FNDB.
FNDB holds 1,618 companies and SPVM holds 100; 100 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score FNDB and SPVM? 5.6 and 4.6 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDB 5.6 out of 10 and SPVM 4.6 out of 10.
They differ most on Quality: FNDB 4.9 and SPVM 2.3.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | FNDB | SPVM |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9 | 2.6 |
| Value | 3.9 | 4.3 |
| Risk | 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Quality | 4.9 | 2.3 |
| Return | 7.8 | 5.9 |
FNDB is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, SPVM charges 0.44% a year, yields 1.91% and holds $134M in assets across 100 positions.
| Measure | FNDB | SPVM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.44% |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 1.91% |
| Assets under management | $1.5B | $134M |
| Holdings | 1618 | 100 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “FNDB vs SPVM holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndb-vs-spvm
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks FNDB vs SPVM prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →