ETF Copilot

FNDB vs QDIV: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and QDIV overlap 10.8% by weight. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals. Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV): S&P 500 quality dividend stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where FNDB and QDIV trade against their own history

FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.

QDIV trades at 15.6 times earnings, against its own median of 15.1, and is more expensive than 56% of its own 100 monthly readings since 2018.

What moved FNDB and QDIV this week

FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.

QDIV rose 1.9% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Factset Research Systems (+8.0%), Dollar GEN (+7.0%) and CDW (+6.7%); Principal Financial (−4.2%) pushed the other way.

What do FNDB and QDIV each hold?

What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.

21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside QDIV: Tech 9%.

23% of QDIV is its ten largest holdings.

How much do FNDB and QDIV overlap? 10.8% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and QDIV overlap 10.8% by weight.

11% of FNDB is already inside QDIV.

100% of QDIV is already inside FNDB.

FNDB holds 1,618 companies and QDIV holds 50; 50 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FNDB and QDIV? 5.6 and 4.3 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDB 5.6 out of 10 and QDIV 4.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: FNDB 7.8 and QDIV 3.2.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FNDB vs QDIV — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorFNDBQDIV
Growth2.91.1
Value3.96.3
Risk8.68.8
Quality4.94.1
Return7.83.2

QDIV is the cheaper of the two at 0.20% a year

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, QDIV charges 0.20% a year, yields 2.79% and holds $29M in assets across 50 positions.

FNDB vs QDIV — cost, income and size
MeasureFNDBQDIV
Expense ratio0.25%0.20%
Dividend yield1.46%2.79%
Assets under management$1.5B$29M
Holdings161850

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FNDB vs QDIV holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndb-vs-qdiv

  1. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB)
  2. Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks FNDB vs QDIV prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →