FNDB vs LSAT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and LSAT overlap 1.3% by weight. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals. LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT): U.S. equities with tactical overlay.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where FNDB and LSAT trade against their own history
FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.
LSAT trades at 11.8 times earnings, against its own median of 12.1, and is cheaper than 56% of its own last 6 years.
What moved FNDB and LSAT this week
FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.
LSAT rose 2.0% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Morningstar (+11.4%), Harley-Davidson (+9.6%) and Fortinet (+7.6%); Allison Transmission (−6.9%) pushed the other way.
What do FNDB and LSAT each hold?
What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.
21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside LSAT: Tech 17%, AI 2%.
35% of LSAT is its ten largest holdings.
How much do FNDB and LSAT overlap? 1.3% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and LSAT overlap 1.3% by weight.
1% of FNDB is already inside LSAT.
100% of LSAT is already inside FNDB.
FNDB holds 1,618 companies and LSAT holds 30; 30 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score FNDB and LSAT? 5.6 and 4.6 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDB 5.6 out of 10 and LSAT 4.6 out of 10.
They differ most on Return: FNDB 7.8 and LSAT 3.0.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | FNDB | LSAT |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9 | 3.6 |
| Value | 3.9 | 5.5 |
| Risk | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Quality | 4.9 | 3.6 |
| Return | 7.8 | 3.0 |
FNDB is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, LSAT charges 0.99% a year, yields 1.63% and holds $66M in assets across 30 positions.
| Measure | FNDB | LSAT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.99% |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 1.63% |
| Assets under management | $1.5B | $66M |
| Holdings | 1618 | 30 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “FNDB vs LSAT holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndb-vs-lsat
- Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB)
- LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT)
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks FNDB vs LSAT prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →