ETF Copilot

FNDB vs KONG: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and KONG overlap 8.4% by weight. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG): Low-debt, low-volatility global stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where FNDB and KONG trade against their own history

FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

KONG trades at 28.0 times earnings, against its own median of 22.1, and is more expensive than 98% of its own last 5 years.

What moved FNDB and KONG this week

FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.

KONG rose 2.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Cboe (+12.1%), ServiceNow (+4.8%) and F5 Networks (+5.7%); Monolithic Power Systems (−3.7%) pushed the other way.

What do FNDB and KONG each hold?

What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.

21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside KONG: Tech 38%, AI 18%.

44% of KONG is its ten largest holdings.

How much do FNDB and KONG overlap? 8.4% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB and KONG overlap 8.4% by weight.

8% of FNDB is already inside KONG.

100% of KONG is already inside FNDB.

FNDB holds 1,618 companies and KONG holds 34; 34 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FNDB and KONG? 5.6 and 5.6 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDB 5.6 out of 10 and KONG 5.6 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: FNDB 7.8 and KONG 2.7.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FNDB vs KONG — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorFNDBKONG
Growth2.97.2
Value3.90.2
Risk8.69.5
Quality4.99.2
Return7.82.7

FNDB is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year

As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, KONG charges 0.89% a year, yields 0.33% and holds $23M in assets across 34 positions.

FNDB vs KONG — cost, income and size
MeasureFNDBKONG
Expense ratio0.25%0.89%
Dividend yield1.46%0.33%
Assets under management$1.5B$23M
Holdings161834

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FNDB vs KONG holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndb-vs-kong

  1. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB)
  2. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks FNDB vs KONG prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →