COWS vs FNDB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, COWS and FNDB overlap 7.4% by weight. Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS): US dividend stocks with cash flow Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where COWS and FNDB trade against their own history
COWS trades at 17.1 times earnings, against its own median of 12.8, and is more expensive than 79% of its own 38 monthly readings since 2023.
FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved COWS and FNDB this week
COWS rose 1.7% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Constellation Brands (+8.7%), Intuit (+7.7%) and Zoetis (+7.3%); T-Mobile US (−9.2%) pushed the other way.
FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.
What do COWS and FNDB each hold?
What's inside COWS: Tech 21%, Semiconductors 3%.
31% of COWS is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.
21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.
How much do COWS and FNDB overlap? 7.4% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, COWS and FNDB overlap 7.4% by weight.
99% of COWS is already inside FNDB.
7% of FNDB is already inside COWS.
COWS holds 42 companies and FNDB holds 1,618; 40 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score COWS and FNDB? 3.8 and 5.6 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores COWS 3.8 out of 10 and FNDB 5.6 out of 10.
They differ most on Risk: COWS 5.4 and FNDB 8.6.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | COWS | FNDB |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.6 | 2.9 |
| Value | 1.4 | 3.9 |
| Risk | 5.4 | 8.6 |
| Quality | 6.1 | 4.9 |
| Return | 5.0 | 7.8 |
FNDB is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year
As of October 9, 2026, COWS charges 0.39% a year, yields 1.34% and holds $41M in assets across 42 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.
| Measure | COWS | FNDB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Dividend yield | 1.34% | 1.46% |
| Assets under management | $41M | $1.5B |
| Holdings | 42 | 1618 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “COWS vs FNDB holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/cows-vs-fndb
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks COWS vs FNDB prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →