ETF Copilot

COWG vs IWB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, COWG and IWB overlap 14.2% by weight. Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG): Large-cap U.S. growth stocks. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB): Russell 1000 index.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where COWG and IWB trade against their own history

COWG trades at 26.3 times earnings, against its own median of 28.7, and is cheaper than 66% of its own 47 monthly readings since 2022.

IWB trades at 24.4 times earnings, against its own median of 22.4, and is more expensive than 63% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved COWG and IWB this week

COWG rose 2.8% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Okta (+9.8%), Fortinet (+7.6%) and Unity Software (+7.5%); Sandisk (−8.0%) pushed the other way.

IWB rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

What do COWG and IWB each hold?

What's inside COWG: Tech 67%, AI 17%.

32% of COWG is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside IWB: Tech 44%, Magnificent 7 32%.

37% of IWB is its ten largest holdings.

How much do COWG and IWB overlap? 14.2% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, COWG and IWB overlap 14.2% by weight.

100% of COWG is already inside IWB.

29% of IWB is already inside COWG.

COWG holds 102 companies and IWB holds 1,023; 100 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score COWG and IWB? 6.4 and 6.7 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores COWG 6.4 out of 10 and IWB 6.7 out of 10.

They differ most on Value: COWG 6.4 and IWB 3.1.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

COWG vs IWB — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorCOWGIWB
Growth7.17.3
Value6.43.1
Risk4.26.6
Quality7.08.1
Return6.97.8

IWB is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of October 9, 2026, COWG charges 0.49% a year, yields 0.74% and holds $2.4B in assets across 102 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, IWB charges 0.15% a year, yields 0.90% and holds $49.6B in assets across 1023 positions.

COWG vs IWB — cost, income and size
MeasureCOWGIWB
Expense ratio0.49%0.15%
Dividend yield0.74%0.90%
Assets under management$2.4B$49.6B
Holdings1021023

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “COWG vs IWB holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/cowg-vs-iwb

  1. Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG)
  2. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks COWG vs IWB prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →