ETF Copilot

CGGO vs GSWO: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, CGGO and GSWO overlap 25.5% by weight. Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO): Global growth-oriented stocks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO): Developed-market large and mid caps

Updated October 9, 2026

Where CGGO and GSWO trade against their own history

CGGO trades at 19.4 times earnings, against its own median of 23.2, and is cheaper than 92% of its own 52 monthly readings since 2022.

GSWO trades at 21.6 times earnings, against its own median of 19.9, and is more expensive than 84% of its own 56 monthly readings since 2022.

What moved CGGO and GSWO this week

CGGO fell 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Taiwan Semiconductor (−4.1%), SK Hynix (−8.3%) and Intel (−12.3%); Amazon.com (+4.3%) pushed the other way.

GSWO rose 0.7% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

What do CGGO and GSWO each hold?

What's inside CGGO: Tech 46%, Semiconductors 25%.

35% of CGGO is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside GSWO: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 26%.

29% of GSWO is its ten largest holdings.

How much do CGGO and GSWO overlap? 25.5% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, CGGO and GSWO overlap 25.5% by weight.

69% of CGGO is already inside GSWO.

36% of GSWO is already inside CGGO.

CGGO holds 100 companies and GSWO holds 738; 68 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score CGGO and GSWO? 7.6 and 6.0 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores CGGO 7.6 out of 10 and GSWO 6.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Value: CGGO 9.1 and GSWO 1.1.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

CGGO vs GSWO — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorCGGOGSWO
Growth9.26.3
Value9.11.1
Risk5.59.7
Quality8.37.8
Return5.85.6

GSWO is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of October 9, 2026, CGGO charges 0.47% a year, yields 1.01% and holds $12.0B in assets across 100 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, GSWO charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.44% and holds $1.8B in assets across 738 positions.

CGGO vs GSWO — cost, income and size
MeasureCGGOGSWO
Expense ratio0.47%0.15%
Dividend yield1.01%1.44%
Assets under management$12.0B$1.8B
Holdings100738

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “CGGO vs GSWO holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/cggo-vs-gswo

  1. Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO)
  2. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks CGGO vs GSWO prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →