ETF Copilot

ACWI vs QWLD: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and QWLD overlap 61.8% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD): Developed market large-mid caps.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and QWLD trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

QWLD trades at 20.7 times earnings, against its own median of 19.4, and is more expensive than 74% of its own last 9 years.

What moved ACWI and QWLD this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

QWLD rose 0.8% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Visa (+6.9%) and Palantir Technologies (+10.8%); Lam Research (−8.2%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and QWLD each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside QWLD: Tech 28%, Magnificent 7 13%.

19% of QWLD is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and QWLD overlap? 61.8% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and QWLD overlap 61.8% by weight.

87% of ACWI is already inside QWLD.

100% of QWLD is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and QWLD holds 1,221; 1,217 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and QWLD? 6.4 and 5.5 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and QWLD 5.5 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: ACWI 7.5 and QWLD 4.1.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs QWLD — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIQWLD
Growth7.54.1
Value2.41.9
Risk6.88.8
Quality7.67.6
Return6.95.6

QWLD is the cheaper of the two at 0.30% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, QWLD charges 0.30% a year, yields 1.78% and holds $175M in assets across 1221 positions.

ACWI vs QWLD — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIQWLD
Expense ratio0.32%0.30%
Dividend yield1.40%1.78%
Assets under management$33.3B$175M
Holdings22141221

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs QWLD holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-qwld

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs QWLD prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →