ACWI vs OUSA: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and OUSA overlap 27.2% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. ALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA): U.S. quality dividend stocks.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where ACWI and OUSA trade against their own history
ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
OUSA trades at 21.3 times earnings, against its own median of 21.1, and is more expensive than 51% of its own 106 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved ACWI and OUSA this week
ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.
OUSA rose 2.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Visa (+6.9%), Mastercard (+6.7%) and Cisco Systems (+5.5%); AT&T (−8.7%) pushed the other way.
What do ACWI and OUSA each hold?
What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.
26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside OUSA: Tech 29%, Magnificent 7 19%.
43% of OUSA is its ten largest holdings.
How much do ACWI and OUSA overlap? 27.2% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and OUSA overlap 27.2% by weight.
33% of ACWI is already inside OUSA.
100% of OUSA is already inside ACWI.
ACWI holds 2,214 companies and OUSA holds 101; 100 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and OUSA? 6.4 and 5.8 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and OUSA 5.8 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: ACWI 7.5 and OUSA 2.1.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | ACWI | OUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5 | 2.1 |
| Value | 2.4 | 5.6 |
| Risk | 6.8 | 9.3 |
| Quality | 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Return | 6.9 | 4.5 |
ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, OUSA charges 0.48% a year, yields 1.37% and holds $721M in assets across 101 positions.
| Measure | ACWI | OUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.48% |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.37% |
| Assets under management | $33.3B | $721M |
| Holdings | 2214 | 101 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs OUSA holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-ousa
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs OUSA prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →