ETF Copilot

ACWI vs OSEA: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and OSEA overlap 3.5% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA): Non-U.S. high-quality companies.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and OSEA trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

OSEA trades at 24.9 times earnings, against its own median of 25.3, and is cheaper than 65% of its own last 3 years.

What moved ACWI and OSEA this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

OSEA rose 1.1% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nu Holdings (+20.0%), MercadoLibre (+11.4%) and Tesco (+7.7%); Schneider Electric (−12.3%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and OSEA each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside OSEA: Tech 23%, Semiconductors 14%.

46% of OSEA is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and OSEA overlap? 3.5% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and OSEA overlap 3.5% by weight.

4% of ACWI is already inside OSEA.

92% of OSEA is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and OSEA holds 30; 29 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and OSEA? 6.4 and 5.3 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and OSEA 5.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: ACWI 6.9 and OSEA 1.1.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs OSEA — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIOSEA
Growth7.56.9
Value2.44.2
Risk6.88.5
Quality7.67.3
Return6.91.1

ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, OSEA charges 0.55% a year, yields 1.28% and holds $383M in assets across 30 positions.

ACWI vs OSEA — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIOSEA
Expense ratio0.32%0.55%
Dividend yield1.40%1.28%
Assets under management$33.3B$383M
Holdings221430

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs OSEA holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-osea

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs OSEA prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →