ACWI vs IBOT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and IBOT overlap 8.8% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT): Robotics, automation, and AI hardware
Updated October 9, 2026
Where ACWI and IBOT trade against their own history
ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
IBOT trades at 29.2 times earnings, against its own median of 28.8, and is more expensive than 58% of its own 43 monthly readings since 2023.
What moved ACWI and IBOT this week
ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.
IBOT fell 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were ASML (−4.7%), Rockwell Automation (−4.8%) and Lam Research (−8.2%); PTC (+35.0%) pushed the other way.
What do ACWI and IBOT each hold?
What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.
26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside IBOT: Tech 52%, Semiconductors 25%.
41% of IBOT is its ten largest holdings.
How much do ACWI and IBOT overlap? 8.8% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and IBOT overlap 8.8% by weight.
9% of ACWI is already inside IBOT.
64% of IBOT is already inside ACWI.
ACWI holds 2,214 companies and IBOT holds 65; 32 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and IBOT? 6.4 and 6.6 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and IBOT 6.6 out of 10.
They differ most on Risk: ACWI 6.8 and IBOT 2.8.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | ACWI | IBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Value | 2.4 | 5.9 |
| Risk | 6.8 | 2.8 |
| Quality | 7.6 | 7.5 |
| Return | 6.9 | 8.5 |
ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, IBOT charges 0.47% a year, yields 0.30% and holds $104M in assets across 65 positions.
| Measure | ACWI | IBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.47% |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.30% |
| Assets under management | $33.3B | $104M |
| Holdings | 2214 | 65 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs IBOT holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-ibot
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs IBOT prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →