ETF Copilot

ACWI vs GVIP: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and GVIP overlap 23.9% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP): Top hedge fund holdings.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and GVIP trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

GVIP trades at 28.7 times earnings, against its own median of 21.6, and is more expensive than 78% of its own last 9 years.

What moved ACWI and GVIP this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

GVIP rose 0.9% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nu Holdings (+20.0%), Talen Energy (+18.0%) and Vistra Energy (+15.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and GVIP each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside GVIP: Tech 38%, Semiconductors 20%.

24% of GVIP is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and GVIP overlap? 23.9% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and GVIP overlap 23.9% by weight.

31% of ACWI is already inside GVIP.

90% of GVIP is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and GVIP holds 49; 44 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and GVIP? 6.4 and 5.7 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and GVIP 5.7 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: ACWI 6.8 and GVIP 2.3.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs GVIP — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIGVIP
Growth7.59.6
Value2.40.7
Risk6.82.3
Quality7.66.2
Return6.96.9

ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, GVIP charges 0.45% a year, yields 0.30% and holds $579M in assets across 49 positions.

ACWI vs GVIP — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIGVIP
Expense ratio0.32%0.45%
Dividend yield1.40%0.30%
Assets under management$33.3B$579M
Holdings221449

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs GVIP holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-gvip

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs GVIP prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →