ETF Copilot

ACWI vs GSWO: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and GSWO overlap 72.6% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO): Developed-market large and mid caps

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and GSWO trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.

GSWO trades at 21.6 times earnings, against its own median of 19.9, and is more expensive than 84% of its own 56 monthly readings since 2022.

What moved ACWI and GSWO this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

GSWO rose 0.7% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and GSWO each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside GSWO: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 26%.

29% of GSWO is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and GSWO overlap? 72.6% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and GSWO overlap 72.6% by weight.

77% of ACWI is already inside GSWO.

95% of GSWO is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and GSWO holds 738; 650 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and GSWO? 6.4 and 6.0 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and GSWO 6.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: ACWI 6.8 and GSWO 9.7.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs GSWO — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIGSWO
Growth7.56.3
Value2.41.1
Risk6.89.7
Quality7.67.8
Return6.95.6

GSWO is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, GSWO charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.44% and holds $1.8B in assets across 738 positions.

ACWI vs GSWO — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIGSWO
Expense ratio0.32%0.15%
Dividend yield1.40%1.44%
Assets under management$33.3B$1.8B
Holdings2214738

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs GSWO holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-gswo

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs GSWO prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →