ETF Copilot

ACWI vs GGME: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and GGME overlap 13.9% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME): Global media and gaming stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and GGME trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

GGME trades at 26.8 times earnings, against its own median of 31.9, and is cheaper than 90% of its own last 3 years.

What moved ACWI and GGME this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

GGME rose 1.0% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Spotify Technology (+11.9%), Netflix (+4.8%) and Autodesk (+11.0%); Advanced Micro Devices (−4.1%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and GGME each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside GGME: Tech 71%, AI 31%.

64% of GGME is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and GGME overlap? 13.9% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and GGME overlap 13.9% by weight.

14% of ACWI is already inside GGME.

90% of GGME is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and GGME holds 97; 36 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and GGME? 6.4 and 5.9 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and GGME 5.9 out of 10.

They differ most on Value: ACWI 2.4 and GGME 9.5.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs GGME — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIGGME
Growth7.56.6
Value2.49.5
Risk6.81.6
Quality7.67.6
Return6.94.7

ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, GGME charges 0.66% a year, yields 0.06% and holds $45M in assets across 97 positions.

ACWI vs GGME — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIGGME
Expense ratio0.32%0.66%
Dividend yield1.40%0.06%
Assets under management$33.3B$45M
Holdings221497

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs GGME holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-ggme

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs GGME prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →