ACWI vs DBJP: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, ACWI and DBJP overlap 5.0% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large- and mid-cap global stocks. Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP): Hedged Japanese equities.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do ACWI and DBJP overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, ACWI and DBJP overlap 5.0% by weight.

5% of ACWI is already inside DBJP.

97% of DBJP is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,169 companies and DBJP holds 167; 165 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and DBJP?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 5.5 out of 10 and DBJP 3.9 out of 10.

They differ most on Quality: ACWI 7.8 and DBJP 2.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs DBJP — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIDBJP
Growth5.31.4
Valuation2.20.4
Risk5.04.7
Quality7.82.6
Return6.79.1

ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year

As of September 11, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.62% and holds $33.4B in assets across 2169 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, DBJP charges 0.45% a year, yields 2.04% and holds $710M in assets across 167 positions.

ACWI vs DBJP — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIDBJP
Expense ratio0.32%0.45%
Dividend yield1.62%2.04%
Assets under management$33.4B$710M
Holdings2169167

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where ACWI and DBJP trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.4 times earnings, against its own median of 17.7, and is more expensive than 86% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

DBJP trades at 18.0 times earnings, against its own median of 11.3, and is more expensive than 96% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved ACWI this week

ACWI fell 1.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Novartis (−15.2%); SK Hynix (+14.8%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and DBJP each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 36%, Magnificent 7 21%.

25% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside DBJP: Tech 27%, Semiconductors 8%.

31% of DBJP is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs DBJP holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-dbjp

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP)

Register free to unlock ACWI vs DBJP prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →