ETF Copilot

ACWI vs BKGI: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and BKGI overlap 0.7% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI): Dividend-paying infrastructure stocks

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and BKGI trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

BKGI trades at 17.7 times earnings, against its own median of 14.4, and is more expensive than 79% of its own last 3 years.

What moved ACWI and BKGI this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

BKGI fell 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Hess Midstream (−14.5%), Healthpeak Properties (−3.5%) and Omega Healthcare Investors (−2.9%); Vistra Energy (+15.3%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and BKGI each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

55% of BKGI is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and BKGI overlap? 0.7% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and BKGI overlap 0.7% by weight.

1% of ACWI is already inside BKGI.

66% of BKGI is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and BKGI holds 29; 18 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and BKGI? 6.4 and 4.4 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and BKGI 4.4 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: ACWI 7.5 and BKGI 0.8.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs BKGI — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIBKGI
Growth7.50.8
Value2.42.0
Risk6.89.6
Quality7.65.4
Return6.95.4

ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, BKGI charges 0.65% a year, yields 3.18% and holds $1.8B in assets across 29 positions.

ACWI vs BKGI — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIBKGI
Expense ratio0.32%0.65%
Dividend yield1.40%3.18%
Assets under management$33.3B$1.8B
Holdings221429

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs BKGI holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-bkgi

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs BKGI prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →