ACWI vs BAMG: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and BAMG overlap 36.0% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG): Large US growth stocks
Updated October 9, 2026
Where ACWI and BAMG trade against their own history
ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
BAMG trades at 28.7 times earnings, against its own median of 30.4, and is cheaper than 84% of its own 38 monthly readings since 2023.
What moved ACWI and BAMG this week
ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.
BAMG rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Amazon.com (+4.3%), Visa (+6.9%) and Palantir Technologies (+10.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (−4.1%) pushed the other way.
What do ACWI and BAMG each hold?
What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.
26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside BAMG: Tech 50%, AI 27%.
44% of BAMG is its ten largest holdings.
How much do ACWI and BAMG overlap? 36.0% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and BAMG overlap 36.0% by weight.
36% of ACWI is already inside BAMG.
100% of BAMG is already inside ACWI.
ACWI holds 2,214 companies and BAMG holds 100; 100 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and BAMG? 6.4 and 7.3 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and BAMG 7.3 out of 10.
They differ most on Quality: ACWI 7.6 and BAMG 9.7.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | ACWI | BAMG |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Value | 2.4 | 4.4 |
| Risk | 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Quality | 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Return | 6.9 | 6.9 |
ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year
As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, BAMG charges 0.95% a year and holds $137M in assets across 100 positions.
| Measure | ACWI | BAMG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.95% |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | — |
| Assets under management | $33.3B | $137M |
| Holdings | 2214 | 100 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs BAMG holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-bamg
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs BAMG prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →