ETF Copilot

ACWI vs AOTG: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and AOTG overlap 22.3% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG): US growth, low-cost models

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and AOTG trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.

AOTG trades at 24.8 times earnings, against its own median of 38.0, and is cheaper than 91% of its own 53 monthly readings since 2022.

What moved ACWI and AOTG this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

AOTG fell 0.6% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Advanced Micro Devices (−4.1%), Micron Technology (−4.3%) and SK Hynix American Depository (−13.4%); Nu Holdings (+20.0%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and AOTG each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside AOTG: Tech 77%, Semiconductors 44%.

66% of AOTG is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and AOTG overlap? 22.3% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and AOTG overlap 22.3% by weight.

23% of ACWI is already inside AOTG.

90% of AOTG is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and AOTG holds 45; 37 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and AOTG? 6.4 and 8.0 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and AOTG 8.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Value: ACWI 2.4 and AOTG 9.2.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs AOTG — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIAOTG
Growth7.59.9
Value2.49.2
Risk6.81.8
Quality7.69.7
Return6.98.3

ACWI is the cheaper of the two at 0.32% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, AOTG charges 0.75% a year and holds $112M in assets across 45 positions.

ACWI vs AOTG — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIAOTG
Expense ratio0.32%0.75%
Dividend yield1.40%—
Assets under management$33.3B$112M
Holdings221445

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs AOTG holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-aotg

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs AOTG prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →