Is RPV a good investment?

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) is a US large-cap value ETF. As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores RPV 4.2 out of 10 — highest on Growth (7.7), lowest on Quality (0.3). It trades at 15.9 times earnings, against its own median of 12.3. Its ten largest holdings are 21% of the fund.

Updated September 11, 2026

How is RPV rated? ETF Copilot scores Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) 4.2 out of 10

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) 4.2 out of 10 overall.

ETF Copilot scores (0–10 scale, higher is better):

Overall: 4.2 / 10
Growth: 7.7 / 10
Valuation: 0.8 / 10
Risk: 2.8 / 10
Quality: 0.3 / 10
Return: 6.6 / 10

What is RPV's expense ratio? 0.35% a year

As of September 11, 2026, RPV charges 0.35% a year, yields 3.06% and holds $1.7B in assets across 120 positions.

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) — cost, income and size
Measure	RPV
Expense ratio	0.35%
Dividend yield	3.06%
Assets under management	$1.7B
Holdings	120

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

What stands out in RPV's data

S&P 500 pure value stocks, screened for the cheapest prices.

Profitability runs far behind the typical large-value fund — its edge has to come from price alone.

EBITDA margin of 12.9% trails the category median of 27.9% and sits below its own historical median of 15.2%, though analysts forecast earnings growth of 20% ahead.

A deep-value position that accepts lower-quality holdings for price-driven returns.

Why did RPV move this week? It fell 1.1% in the week to September 11, 2026 — Target and Stanley Black & Decker drove it

RPV fell 1.1% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Target (−5.0%), Stanley Black & Decker (−7.5%) and DOW (−4.4%); Hewlett Packa (+14.1%) pushed the other way.

Is RPV expensive right now? It trades at 15.9 times earnings, against its own median of 12.3

As of September 11, 2026, RPV is more expensive than 92% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017 — 105 of those months were cheaper than today.

Trailing twelve-month, computed by ETF Copilot from the fund's holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

What's inside RPV?

What's inside RPV: Size (Large 57%, Mid 43%, Small 0%); Geography (International 5%, US 95%); Tech 3.7%.

What are RPV's top holdings? The ten largest are 21% of the fund

Centene, Bunge Global, Archer-Daniels-Midland, Humana, Valero Energy, Phillips 66, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ford Motor, Target and CVS Health are RPV's largest holdings, in that order.

Less concentrated than 59% of US Large Cap Value ETFs.

Half of RPV's weight sits in its 31 largest positions, and once those weights are taken into account it behaves like 84 equally weighted holdings.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) scores and holdings analysis”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/etf/rpv