PFFD vs SSO: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, PFFD and SSO overlap 1.9% by weight. Global X - U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD): U.S. dollar-denominated preferred securities. ProShares - Ultra S&P500 (SSO): 2x daily S&P 500 exposure.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do PFFD and SSO overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, PFFD and SSO overlap 1.9% by weight.

8% of PFFD is already inside SSO.

2% of SSO is already inside PFFD.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score PFFD and SSO?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores PFFD 6.0 out of 10 and SSO 5.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: PFFD 9.7 and SSO 0.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

PFFD vs SSO — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	PFFD	SSO
Growth	8.9	3.0
Risk	9.7	0.6
Return	0.7	9.4

PFFD is the cheaper of the two at 0.23% a year

As of September 11, 2026, PFFD charges 0.23% a year, yields 2.39% and holds $2.1B in assets.

As of September 11, 2026, SSO charges 0.88% a year, yields 1.10% and holds $8.9B in assets.

PFFD vs SSO — cost, income and size
Measure	PFFD	SSO
Expense ratio	0.23%	0.88%
Dividend yield	2.39%	1.10%
Assets under management	$2.1B	$8.9B

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

What moved SSO this week

SSO fell 2.4% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “PFFD vs SSO holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/pffd-vs-sso