IWF vs SCHG: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of September 11, 2026, IWF and SCHG overlap 65.8% by weight. iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF): Russell 1000 Growth index. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG): U.S. large-cap growth stocks.
Updated September 11, 2026
How much do IWF and SCHG overlap?
As of September 11, 2026, IWF and SCHG overlap 65.8% by weight.
77% of IWF is already inside SCHG.
86% of SCHG is already inside IWF.
IWF holds 369 companies and SCHG holds 194; 123 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score IWF and SCHG?
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IWF 6.3 out of 10 and SCHG 6.3 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: IWF 6.3 and SCHG 3.9.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | IWF | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3 | 3.9 |
| Valuation | 4.1 | 5.2 |
| Risk | 3.5 | 5.3 |
| Quality | 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Return | 7.4 | 8.1 |
SCHG is the cheaper of the two at 0.04% a year
As of September 11, 2026, IWF charges 0.18% a year, yields 0.46% and holds $126.0B in assets across 369 positions.
As of September 11, 2026, SCHG charges 0.04% a year, yields 0.44% and holds $62.0B in assets across 194 positions.
| Measure | IWF | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 0.44% |
| Assets under management | $126.0B | $62.0B |
| Holdings | 369 | 194 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Where IWF and SCHG trade against their own history
IWF trades at 31.0 times earnings, against its own median of 27.3, and is more expensive than 75% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
SCHG trades at 30.4 times earnings, against its own median of 27.2, and is more expensive than 73% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved IWF and SCHG this week
IWF fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.
SCHG fell 1.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.
What do IWF and SCHG each hold?
What's inside IWF: Tech 70%, Magnificent 7 47%.
57% of IWF is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside SCHG: Tech 58%, Magnificent 7 46%.
52% of SCHG is its ten largest holdings.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “IWF vs SCHG holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iwf-vs-schg
Register free to unlock IWF vs SCHG prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.
Register free →