IWF vs IWD: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, IWF and IWD overlap 18.0% by weight. iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF): Russell 1000 Growth index. iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD): Russell 1000 Value index.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do IWF and IWD overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, IWF and IWD overlap 18.0% by weight.

27% of IWF is already inside IWD.

36% of IWD is already inside IWF.

IWF holds 369 companies and IWD holds 868; 216 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score IWF and IWD?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IWF 6.3 out of 10 and IWD 4.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: IWF 6.3 and IWD 1.1.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

IWF vs IWD — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorIWFIWD
Growth6.31.1
Valuation4.11.0
Risk3.55.4
Quality9.96.1
Return7.46.5

IWF and IWD all charge 0.18% a year

As of September 11, 2026, IWF charges 0.18% a year, yields 0.46% and holds $126.0B in assets across 369 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, IWD charges 0.18% a year, yields 1.69% and holds $84.1B in assets across 868 positions.

IWF vs IWD — cost, income and size
MeasureIWFIWD
Expense ratio0.18%0.18%
Dividend yield0.46%1.69%
Assets under management$126.0B$84.1B
Holdings369868

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where IWF and IWD trade against their own history

IWF trades at 31.0 times earnings, against its own median of 27.3, and is more expensive than 75% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

IWD trades at 21.3 times earnings, against its own median of 17.2, and is more expensive than 92% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved IWF and IWD this week

IWF fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

IWD fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (−2.8%), Johnson & Johnson (−4.6%) and Merck (−5.5%); Intel (+12.3%) pushed the other way.

What do IWF and IWD each hold?

What's inside IWF: Tech 70%, Magnificent 7 47%.

57% of IWF is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside IWD: Tech 21%, Magnificent 7 18%.

29% of IWD is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “IWF vs IWD holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iwf-vs-iwd

  1. iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF)
  2. iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD)

Register free to unlock IWF vs IWD prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →