IVW vs IWF: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, IVW and IWF overlap 76.0% by weight. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW): S&P 500 Growth index. iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF): Russell 1000 Growth index.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do IVW and IWF overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, IVW and IWF overlap 76.0% by weight.

87% of IVW is already inside IWF.

87% of IWF is already inside IVW.

IVW holds 151 companies and IWF holds 369; 108 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score IVW and IWF?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IVW 6.0 out of 10 and IWF 6.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: IVW 3.5 and IWF 6.3.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

IVW vs IWF — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorIVWIWF
Growth3.56.3
Valuation4.84.1
Risk3.73.5
Quality10.09.9
Return8.47.4

IVW and IWF all charge 0.18% a year

As of September 11, 2026, IVW charges 0.18% a year, yields 0.54% and holds $77.3B in assets across 151 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, IWF charges 0.18% a year, yields 0.46% and holds $126.0B in assets across 369 positions.

IVW vs IWF — cost, income and size
MeasureIVWIWF
Expense ratio0.18%0.18%
Dividend yield0.54%0.46%
Assets under management$77.3B$126.0B
Holdings151369

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where IVW and IWF trade against their own history

IVW trades at 27.9 times earnings, against its own median of 26.2, and is more expensive than 67% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

IWF trades at 31.0 times earnings, against its own median of 27.3, and is more expensive than 75% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved IVW and IWF this week

IVW fell 1.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

IWF fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

What do IVW and IWF each hold?

What's inside IVW: Tech 68%, Magnificent 7 51%.

60% of IVW is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside IWF: Tech 70%, Magnificent 7 47%.

57% of IWF is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “IVW vs IWF holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/ivw-vs-iwf

  1. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW)
  2. iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF)

Register free to unlock IVW vs IWF prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →