ICLN vs QCLN: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, ICLN and QCLN overlap 24.3% by weight. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN): Global clean energy stocks. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN): Owns a focused strategy.
Updated October 28, 2026
Where ICLN and QCLN trade against their own history
ICLN trades at 18.7 times earnings, against its own median of 17.7, and is more expensive than 57% of its own last 9 years.
QCLN trades at 34.7 times earnings, against its own median of 24.9, and is more expensive than 87% of its own last 9 years.
What moved ICLN and QCLN this week
ICLN fell 4.5% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Axia Energia (−22.4%), Equatorial Energia (−34.0%) and Enphase Energy (−21.9%); Iberdrola (+1.4%) pushed the other way.
QCLN fell 0.7% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Monolithic Power Systems (−5.6%), Bloom Energy (−4.4%) and Rivian Automotive (−6.3%); Tesla (+4.6%) pushed the other way.
What do ICLN and QCLN each hold?
What's inside ICLN: Tech 2%, Semiconductors 1%.
52% of ICLN is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside QCLN: Tech 28%, Semiconductors 24%.
61% of QCLN is its ten largest holdings.
How much do ICLN and QCLN overlap? 24.3% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, ICLN and QCLN overlap 24.3% by weight.
38% of ICLN is already inside QCLN.
29% of QCLN is already inside ICLN.
ICLN holds 122 companies and QCLN holds 57; 14 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score ICLN and QCLN? 2.2 and 3.5 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ICLN 2.2 out of 10 and QCLN 3.5 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: ICLN 1.3 and QCLN 8.4.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | ICLN | QCLN |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3 | 8.4 |
| Value | 5.1 | 1.9 |
| Risk | 1.1 | 0.4 |
| Quality | 3.0 | 1.6 |
| Return | 1.1 | 3.2 |
ICLN is the cheaper of the two at 0.38% a year
As of October 28, 2026, ICLN charges 0.38% a year, yields 1.20% and holds $2.0B in assets across 122 positions.
As of October 28, 2026, QCLN charges 0.59% a year, yields 0.09% and holds $488M in assets across 57 positions.
| Measure | ICLN | QCLN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 0.59% |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 0.09% |
| Assets under management | $2.0B | $488M |
| Holdings | 122 | 57 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “ICLN vs QCLN holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/icln-vs-qcln
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ICLN vs QCLN prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →