SPLV vs XMHQ: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, SPLV and XMHQ overlap 0.0% by weight. Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV): Low-volatility S&P 500 stocks. Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ): High-quality mid-cap stocks.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do SPLV and XMHQ overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, SPLV and XMHQ overlap 0.0% by weight.

0% of SPLV is already inside XMHQ.

0% of XMHQ is already inside SPLV.

SPLV holds 101 companies and XMHQ holds 80; 0 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score SPLV and XMHQ?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores SPLV 4.7 out of 10 and XMHQ 3.9 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: SPLV 8.9 and XMHQ 3.4.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

SPLV vs XMHQ — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorSPLVXMHQ
Growth0.70.5
Valuation8.84.3
Risk8.93.4
Quality6.56.8
Return1.95.3

SPLV is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year

As of September 11, 2026, SPLV charges 0.25% a year, yields 2.57% and holds $7.2B in assets across 101 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, XMHQ charges 0.30% a year, yields 0.92% and holds $5.5B in assets across 80 positions.

SPLV vs XMHQ — cost, income and size
MeasureSPLVXMHQ
Expense ratio0.25%0.30%
Dividend yield2.57%0.92%
Assets under management$7.2B$5.5B
Holdings10180

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where SPLV and XMHQ trade against their own history

SPLV trades at 19.6 times earnings, against its own median of 22.4, and is cheaper than 97% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

XMHQ trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.0, and is more expensive than 74% of its own 88 monthly readings since 2019.

What moved SPLV and XMHQ this week

SPLV fell 1.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were YUM! Brands (−7.7%), Johnson & Johnson (−4.6%) and Laboratory CRP of Amer (−6.0%); Ametek (+3.3%) pushed the other way.

XMHQ fell 3.1% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Illumina (−6.9%), Manhattan Associates (−9.2%) and Technipfmc (−4.7%); Nvent Electric (+6.8%) pushed the other way.

What do SPLV and XMHQ each hold?

13% of SPLV is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside XMHQ: Tech 20%, Memory 2%.

32% of XMHQ is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “SPLV vs XMHQ holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/splv-vs-xmhq

  1. Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV)
  2. Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)

Register free to unlock SPLV vs XMHQ prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →