RECS vs SMLF: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, RECS and SMLF overlap 6.5% by weight. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS): U.S. large- and mid-cap enhanced. iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF): U.S. small-cap factor stocks.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do RECS and SMLF overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, RECS and SMLF overlap 6.5% by weight.

7% of RECS is already inside SMLF.

25% of SMLF is already inside RECS.

RECS holds 356 companies and SMLF holds 891; 136 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score RECS and SMLF?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores RECS 6.4 out of 10 and SMLF 4.8 out of 10.

They differ most on Quality: RECS 8.8 and SMLF 2.4.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

RECS vs SMLF — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorRECSSMLF
Growth4.56.3
Valuation3.74.0
Risk8.34.0
Quality8.82.4
Return7.26.0

RECS and SMLF all charge 0.15% a year

As of September 11, 2026, RECS charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.43% and holds $6.0B in assets across 356 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, SMLF charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.22% and holds $4.3B in assets across 891 positions.

RECS vs SMLF — cost, income and size
MeasureRECSSMLF
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Dividend yield1.43%1.22%
Assets under management$6.0B$4.3B
Holdings356891

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where RECS and SMLF trade against their own history

RECS trades at 23.0 times earnings, against its own median of 19.0, and is more expensive than 88% of its own 85 monthly readings since 2019.

SMLF trades at 18.5 times earnings, against its own median of 16.1, and is more expensive than 75% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved RECS and SMLF this week

RECS fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Palantir Technologies (−8.4%) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (−6.5%); Meta Platforms (+6.1%) pushed the other way.

SMLF fell 2.1% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Casey S General Stores (−18.8%), Servicetitan (−41.3%) and UiPath (−24.5%); Semtech (+23.5%) pushed the other way.

What do RECS and SMLF each hold?

What's inside RECS: Tech 42%, Magnificent 7 29%.

42% of RECS is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside SMLF: Tech 19%, Semiconductors 4%.

8% of SMLF is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “RECS vs SMLF holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/recs-vs-smlf

  1. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS)
  2. iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF)

Register free to unlock RECS vs SMLF prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →