QGRW vs RECS: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, QGRW and RECS overlap 33.1% by weight. WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW): U.S. quality growth stocks. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS): U.S. large- and mid-cap enhanced.
Updated October 28, 2026
Where QGRW and RECS trade against their own history
QGRW trades at 27.8 times earnings, against its own median of 35.3, and is cheaper than 96% of its own last 4 years.
RECS trades at 21.6 times earnings, against its own median of 21.5, and is more expensive than 52% of its own last 7 years.
What moved QGRW and RECS this week
QGRW fell 1.0% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Meta Platforms (−12.2%), Nvidia (−3.0%) and Amazon.com (−3.0%); Micron Technology (+7.6%) pushed the other way.
RECS fell 1.1% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Meta Platforms (−12.2%), Nvidia (−3.0%) and TJX (−4.9%); Micron Technology (+7.6%) pushed the other way.
What do QGRW and RECS each hold?
What's inside QGRW: Tech 60%, Magnificent 7 46%.
57% of QGRW is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside RECS: Tech 37%, Magnificent 7 28%.
42% of RECS is its ten largest holdings.
How much do QGRW and RECS overlap? 33.1% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, QGRW and RECS overlap 33.1% by weight.
41% of QGRW is already inside RECS.
45% of RECS is already inside QGRW.
QGRW holds 100 companies and RECS holds 356; 33 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score QGRW and RECS? 7.8 and 7.0 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores QGRW 7.8 out of 10 and RECS 7.0 out of 10.
They differ most on Risk: QGRW 3.5 and RECS 7.7.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | QGRW | RECS |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0 | 6.3 |
| Value | 9.2 | 6.1 |
| Risk | 3.5 | 7.7 |
| Quality | 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Return | 7.3 | 7.2 |
RECS is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year
As of October 28, 2026, QGRW charges 0.28% a year, yields 0.07% and holds $3.3B in assets across 100 positions.
As of October 28, 2026, RECS charges 0.15% a year, yields 0.99% and holds $6.2B in assets across 356 positions.
| Measure | QGRW | RECS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 0.99% |
| Assets under management | $3.3B | $6.2B |
| Holdings | 100 | 356 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “QGRW vs RECS holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/qgrw-vs-recs
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks QGRW vs RECS prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →