QGRW vs RECS: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, QGRW and RECS overlap 33.7% by weight. WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW): U.S. quality growth stocks. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS): U.S. large- and mid-cap enhanced.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do QGRW and RECS overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, QGRW and RECS overlap 33.7% by weight.

41% of QGRW is already inside RECS.

45% of RECS is already inside QGRW.

QGRW holds 100 companies and RECS holds 356; 33 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score QGRW and RECS?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores QGRW 7.0 out of 10 and RECS 6.4 out of 10.

They differ most on Valuation: QGRW 7.6 and RECS 3.7.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

QGRW vs RECS — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	QGRW	RECS
Growth	4.7	4.5
Valuation	7.6	3.7
Risk	5.9	8.3
Quality	9.7	8.8
Return	7.8	7.2

RECS is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of September 11, 2026, QGRW charges 0.28% a year, yields 0.44% and holds $3.0B in assets across 100 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, RECS charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.43% and holds $6.0B in assets across 356 positions.

QGRW vs RECS — cost, income and size
Measure	QGRW	RECS
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.15%
Dividend yield	0.44%	1.43%
Assets under management	$3.0B	$6.0B
Holdings	100	356

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where QGRW and RECS trade against their own history

QGRW trades at 29.8 times earnings, against its own median of 29.1, and is more expensive than 61% of its own 46 monthly readings since 2022.

RECS trades at 23.0 times earnings, against its own median of 19.0, and is more expensive than 88% of its own 85 monthly readings since 2019.

What moved QGRW and RECS this week

QGRW fell 1.1% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Meta Platforms (+6.1%) pushed the other way.

RECS fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Palantir Technologies (−8.4%) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (−6.5%); Meta Platforms (+6.1%) pushed the other way.

What do QGRW and RECS each hold?

What's inside QGRW: Tech 66%, Magnificent 7 46%.

57% of QGRW is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside RECS: Tech 42%, Magnificent 7 29%.

42% of RECS is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “QGRW vs RECS holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/qgrw-vs-recs