PGX vs QLD: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, PGX and QLD overlap 0.0% by weight. Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX): U.S. fixed-rate preferred securities. ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD): 2x daily tech exposure.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do PGX and QLD overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, PGX and QLD overlap 0.0% by weight.

0% of PGX is already inside QLD.

0% of QLD is already inside PGX.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score PGX and QLD?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores PGX 5.1 out of 10 and QLD 5.8 out of 10.

They differ most on Return: PGX 0.5 and QLD 9.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

PGX vs QLD — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	PGX	QLD
Growth	9.0	6.4
Risk	6.2	0.3
Return	0.5	9.6

PGX is the cheaper of the two at 0.50% a year

As of September 11, 2026, PGX charges 0.50% a year, yields 3.72% and holds $3.7B in assets.

As of September 11, 2026, QLD charges 0.98% a year, yields 0.64% and holds $14.1B in assets.

PGX vs QLD — cost, income and size
Measure	PGX	QLD
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.98%
Dividend yield	3.72%	0.64%
Assets under management	$3.7B	$14.1B

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

What moved QLD this week

QLD fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “PGX vs QLD holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/pgx-vs-qld