PFFD vs QLD: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, PFFD and QLD overlap 0.1% by weight. Global X - U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD): U.S. dollar-denominated preferred securities. ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD): 2x daily tech exposure.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do PFFD and QLD overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, PFFD and QLD overlap 0.1% by weight.

2% of PFFD is already inside QLD.

0% of QLD is already inside PFFD.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score PFFD and QLD?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores PFFD 6.0 out of 10 and QLD 5.8 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: PFFD 9.7 and QLD 0.3.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

PFFD vs QLD — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	PFFD	QLD
Growth	8.9	6.4
Risk	9.7	0.3
Return	0.7	9.6

PFFD is the cheaper of the two at 0.23% a year

As of September 11, 2026, PFFD charges 0.23% a year, yields 2.39% and holds $2.1B in assets.

As of September 11, 2026, QLD charges 0.98% a year, yields 0.64% and holds $14.1B in assets.

PFFD vs QLD — cost, income and size
Measure	PFFD	QLD
Expense ratio	0.23%	0.98%
Dividend yield	2.39%	0.64%
Assets under management	$2.1B	$14.1B

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

What moved QLD this week

QLD fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “PFFD vs QLD holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/pffd-vs-qld