PFF vs QLD: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of September 11, 2026, PFF and QLD overlap 0.3% by weight. iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF): U.S. preferred and hybrid securities. ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD): 2x daily tech exposure.
Updated September 11, 2026
How much do PFF and QLD overlap?
As of September 11, 2026, PFF and QLD overlap 0.3% by weight.
1% of PFF is already inside QLD.
0% of QLD is already inside PFF.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score PFF and QLD?
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores PFF 3.3 out of 10 and QLD 5.8 out of 10.
They differ most on Return: PFF 0.7 and QLD 9.6.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | PFF | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.9 | 6.4 |
| Risk | 6.3 | 0.3 |
| Return | 0.7 | 9.6 |
PFF is the cheaper of the two at 0.45% a year
As of September 11, 2026, PFF charges 0.45% a year, yields 2.67% and holds $12.9B in assets.
As of September 11, 2026, QLD charges 0.98% a year, yields 0.64% and holds $14.1B in assets.
| Measure | PFF | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.98% |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 0.64% |
| Assets under management | $12.9B | $14.1B |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
What moved QLD this week
QLD fell 0.9% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “PFF vs QLD holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/pff-vs-qld
Register free to unlock PFF vs QLD prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.
Register free →