OMFL vs RECS: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, OMFL and RECS overlap 38.3% by weight. Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL): U.S. large-cap stocks. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS): U.S. large- and mid-cap enhanced.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do OMFL and RECS overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, OMFL and RECS overlap 38.3% by weight.

43% of OMFL is already inside RECS.

86% of RECS is already inside OMFL.

OMFL holds 631 companies and RECS holds 356; 234 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score OMFL and RECS?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores OMFL 4.5 out of 10 and RECS 6.4 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: OMFL 1.4 and RECS 4.5.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

OMFL vs RECS — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorOMFLRECS
Growth1.44.5
Valuation1.63.7
Risk7.88.3
Quality9.28.8
Return4.47.2

RECS is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of September 11, 2026, OMFL charges 0.29% a year, yields 1.04% and holds $4.7B in assets across 631 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, RECS charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.43% and holds $6.0B in assets across 356 positions.

OMFL vs RECS — cost, income and size
MeasureOMFLRECS
Expense ratio0.29%0.15%
Dividend yield1.04%1.43%
Assets under management$4.7B$6.0B
Holdings631356

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where OMFL and RECS trade against their own history

OMFL trades at 26.2 times earnings, against its own median of 21.0, and is more expensive than 94% of its own 107 monthly readings since 2017.

RECS trades at 23.0 times earnings, against its own median of 19.0, and is more expensive than 88% of its own 85 monthly readings since 2019.

What moved OMFL and RECS this week

OMFL fell 1.6% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Apple (+1.2%) pushed the other way.

RECS fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Palantir Technologies (−8.4%) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (−6.5%); Meta Platforms (+6.1%) pushed the other way.

What do OMFL and RECS each hold?

What's inside OMFL: Tech 43%, Magnificent 7 30%.

37% of OMFL is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside RECS: Tech 42%, Magnificent 7 29%.

42% of RECS is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “OMFL vs RECS holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/omfl-vs-recs

  1. Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL)
  2. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS)

Register free to unlock OMFL vs RECS prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →