IWS vs SCHM: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of September 11, 2026, IWS and SCHM overlap 35.8% by weight. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS): U.S. mid-cap value stocks. Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM): U.S. mid-cap stocks.
Updated September 11, 2026
How much do IWS and SCHM overlap?
As of September 11, 2026, IWS and SCHM overlap 35.8% by weight.
36% of IWS is already inside SCHM.
77% of SCHM is already inside IWS.
IWS holds 716 companies and SCHM holds 487; 386 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score IWS and SCHM?
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IWS 4.4 out of 10 and SCHM 4.9 out of 10.
They differ most on Growth: IWS 4.4 and SCHM 7.3.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | IWS | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4 | 7.3 |
| Valuation | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Risk | 4.0 | 4.8 |
| Quality | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| Return | 4.8 | 4.6 |
SCHM is the cheaper of the two at 0.03% a year
As of September 11, 2026, IWS charges 0.23% a year, yields 1.84% and holds $15.7B in assets across 716 positions.
As of September 11, 2026, SCHM charges 0.03% a year, yields 1.34% and holds $14.8B in assets across 487 positions.
| Measure | IWS | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.23% | 0.03% |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 1.34% |
| Assets under management | $15.7B | $14.8B |
| Holdings | 716 | 487 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Where IWS and SCHM trade against their own history
IWS trades at 18.6 times earnings, against its own median of 17.3, and is more expensive than 61% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
SCHM trades at 20.3 times earnings, against its own median of 19.0, and is more expensive than 71% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved IWS and SCHM this week
IWS fell 2.3% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Baker Hughes (−7.2%), Workday (−10.3%) and Coinbase Global (−9.1%); Hewlett Packa (+14.1%) pushed the other way.
SCHM fell 1.4% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Casey S General Stores (−18.8%), Guidewire Software (−30.5%) and Cooper (−23.7%); Bloom Energy (+17.1%) pushed the other way.
What do IWS and SCHM each hold?
What's inside IWS: Tech 12%, Semiconductors 1%.
7% of IWS is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside SCHM: Tech 21%, Memory 5%.
13% of SCHM is its ten largest holdings.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “IWS vs SCHM holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iws-vs-schm
Register free to unlock IWS vs SCHM prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.
Register free →