IPAC vs VPL: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, IPAC and VPL overlap 76.0% by weight. iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC): MSCI Pacific IMI index. Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL): Developed Asia-Pacific stocks.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do IPAC and VPL overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, IPAC and VPL overlap 76.0% by weight.

99% of IPAC is already inside VPL.

76% of VPL is already inside IPAC.

IPAC holds 1,337 companies and VPL holds 2,333; 1,288 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score IPAC and VPL?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IPAC 4.1 out of 10 and VPL 5.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: IPAC 7.5 and VPL 3.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

IPAC vs VPL — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorIPACVPL
Growth4.78.5
Valuation0.71.1
Risk7.53.6
Quality3.15.3
Return4.06.0

VPL is the cheaper of the two at 0.07% a year

As of September 11, 2026, IPAC charges 0.09% a year, yields 2.52% and holds $2.8B in assets across 1337 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, VPL charges 0.07% a year, yields 2.30% and holds $13.1B in assets across 2333 positions.

IPAC vs VPL — cost, income and size
MeasureIPACVPL
Expense ratio0.09%0.07%
Dividend yield2.52%2.30%
Assets under management$2.8B$13.1B
Holdings13372333

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where IPAC and VPL trade against their own history

IPAC trades at 17.7 times earnings, against its own median of 12.3, and is more expensive than 94% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

VPL trades at 16.0 times earnings, against its own median of 12.1, and is more expensive than 93% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved IPAC and VPL this week

IPAC fell 0.8% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were BHP (−4.7%), Commonwealth Bank of Austral (−4.2%) and Sony (−5.2%); Softbank (+33.0%) pushed the other way.

VPL rose 1.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were SK Hynix (+14.8%), Samsung Electronics (+4.9%) and Softbank (+33.0%); BHP (−4.7%) pushed the other way.

What do IPAC and VPL each hold?

What's inside IPAC: Tech 18%, Semiconductors 5%.

19% of IPAC is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside VPL: Tech 27%, Memory 15%.

24% of VPL is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “IPAC vs VPL holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/ipac-vs-vpl

  1. iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC)
  2. Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL)

Register free to unlock IPAC vs VPL prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →