IEFA vs SCZ: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of September 11, 2026, IEFA and SCZ overlap 15.0% by weight. iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA): Broad EAFE market equities. iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ): Developed ex-US small-cap stocks.
Updated September 11, 2026
How much do IEFA and SCZ overlap?
As of September 11, 2026, IEFA and SCZ overlap 15.0% by weight.
16% of IEFA is already inside SCZ.
99% of SCZ is already inside IEFA.
IEFA holds 2,592 companies and SCZ holds 2,010; 1,956 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score IEFA and SCZ?
As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores IEFA 5.2 out of 10 and SCZ 3.9 out of 10.
They differ most on Risk: IEFA 7.6 and SCZ 3.8.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | IEFA | SCZ |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Valuation | 2.8 | 4.2 |
| Risk | 7.6 | 3.8 |
| Quality | 4.2 | 1.5 |
| Return | 4.3 | 2.8 |
IEFA is the cheaper of the two at 0.07% a year
As of September 11, 2026, IEFA charges 0.07% a year, yields 2.80% and holds $196.6B in assets across 2592 positions.
As of September 11, 2026, SCZ charges 0.40% a year, yields 2.79% and holds $13.2B in assets across 2010 positions.
| Measure | IEFA | SCZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.40% |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 2.79% |
| Assets under management | $196.6B | $13.2B |
| Holdings | 2592 | 2010 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Where IEFA and SCZ trade against their own history
IEFA trades at 17.6 times earnings, against its own median of 14.6, and is more expensive than 93% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
SCZ trades at 15.3 times earnings, against its own median of 13.0, and is more expensive than 92% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved IEFA and SCZ this week
IEFA fell 1.4% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Novartis (−15.2%), Novo Nordisk A/S-B (−9.3%) and BHP (−4.7%); Softbank (+33.0%) pushed the other way.
SCZ fell 1.6% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Food & Life (−11.1%), Stockland (−8.3%) and Nice-Systems (−10.0%); Lottomatica Group SPA (+12.8%) pushed the other way.
What do IEFA and SCZ each hold?
What's inside IEFA: Tech 13%, Semiconductors 6%.
12% of IEFA is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside SCZ: Tech 11%, Semiconductors 2%.
3% of SCZ is its ten largest holdings.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “IEFA vs SCZ holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/iefa-vs-scz
Register free to unlock IEFA vs SCZ prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.
Register free →