HACK vs CIBR: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, HACK and CIBR overlap 57.2% by weight. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK): Cybersecurity industry leaders. First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR): Cybersecurity sector companies
Updated October 28, 2026
Where HACK and CIBR trade against their own history
HACK trades at 30.3 times earnings, against its own median of 29.5, and is more expensive than 54% of its own last 9 years.
CIBR trades at 28.6 times earnings, against its own median of 27.9, and is more expensive than 56% of its own last 9 years.
What moved HACK and CIBR this week
HACK rose 7.4% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Netskope (+21.6%), Tenable (+19.8%) and Palo Alto Networks (+13.6%); F5 Networks (−20.3%) pushed the other way.
CIBR rose 4.6% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Palo Alto Networks (+13.6%), CrowdStrike (+11.4%) and Zscaler (+10.6%); F5 Networks (−20.3%) pushed the other way.
What do HACK and CIBR each hold?
What's inside HACK: Tech 91%, AI 22%.
52% of HACK is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside CIBR: Tech 97%, AI 33%.
58% of CIBR is its ten largest holdings.
How much do HACK and CIBR overlap? 57.2% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, HACK and CIBR overlap 57.2% by weight.
91% of HACK is already inside CIBR.
69% of CIBR is already inside HACK.
HACK holds 24 companies and CIBR holds 44; 21 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score HACK and CIBR? 4.8 and 4.8 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores HACK 4.8 out of 10 and CIBR 4.8 out of 10.
They differ most on Value: HACK 3.9 and CIBR 2.5.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | HACK | CIBR |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.1 | 5.9 |
| Value | 3.9 | 2.5 |
| Risk | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Quality | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Return | 9.4 | 9.4 |
CIBR is the cheaper of the two at 0.58% a year
As of October 28, 2026, HACK charges 0.60% a year, yields 0.05% and holds $3.8B in assets across 24 positions.
As of October 28, 2026, CIBR charges 0.58% a year, yields 0.36% and holds $19.0B in assets across 44 positions.
| Measure | HACK | CIBR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.58% |
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | 0.36% |
| Assets under management | $3.8B | $19.0B |
| Holdings | 24 | 44 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Compare with similar funds
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “HACK vs CIBR holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/hack-vs-cibr
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks HACK vs CIBR prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →