HACK vs CIBR: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, HACK and CIBR overlap 56.6% by weight. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK): Cybersecurity industry leaders. First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR): Cybersecurity sector companies

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do HACK and CIBR overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, HACK and CIBR overlap 56.6% by weight.

87% of HACK is already inside CIBR.

69% of CIBR is already inside HACK.

HACK holds 24 companies and CIBR holds 40; 20 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score HACK and CIBR?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores HACK 5.5 out of 10 and CIBR 5.7 out of 10.

They differ most on Valuation: HACK 4.3 and CIBR 2.0.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

HACK vs CIBR — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorHACKCIBR
Growth8.88.8
Valuation4.32.0
Risk2.02.8
Quality1.12.9
Return8.18.8

CIBR is the cheaper of the two at 0.58% a year

As of September 11, 2026, HACK charges 0.60% a year, yields 0.54% and holds $2.9B in assets across 24 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, CIBR charges 0.58% a year, yields 0.63% and holds $15.2B in assets across 40 positions.

HACK vs CIBR — cost, income and size
MeasureHACKCIBR
Expense ratio0.60%0.58%
Dividend yield0.54%0.63%
Assets under management$2.9B$15.2B
Holdings2440

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where HACK and CIBR trade against their own history

HACK trades at 32.4 times earnings, against its own median of 29.1, and is more expensive than 78% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

CIBR trades at 31.5 times earnings, against its own median of 27.8, and is more expensive than 84% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved HACK and CIBR this week

HACK fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Qualys (−13.8%), Tenable (−12.7%) and Zscaler (−7.5%); Cloudflare (+7.7%) pushed the other way.

CIBR fell 1.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were CrowdStrike (−3.8%), Zscaler (−7.5%) and Rubrik (−6.0%); Cloudflare (+7.7%) pushed the other way.

What do HACK and CIBR each hold?

What's inside HACK: Tech 91%, AI 23%.

53% of HACK is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside CIBR: Tech 96%, AI 33%.

59% of CIBR is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “HACK vs CIBR holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/hack-vs-cibr

  1. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK)
  2. First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR)

Register free to unlock HACK vs CIBR prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →