GSLC vs IWB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, GSLC and IWB overlap 74.8% by weight. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC): U.S. large-cap stocks. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB): Russell 1000 index.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do GSLC and IWB overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, GSLC and IWB overlap 74.8% by weight.

99% of GSLC is already inside IWB.

89% of IWB is already inside GSLC.

GSLC holds 423 companies and IWB holds 1,020; 417 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score GSLC and IWB?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores GSLC 5.5 out of 10 and IWB 5.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: GSLC 7.6 and IWB 4.9.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

GSLC vs IWB — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorGSLCIWB
Growth2.23.2
Valuation3.42.8
Risk7.64.9
Quality8.58.2
Return6.97.4

GSLC is the cheaper of the two at 0.09% a year

As of September 11, 2026, GSLC charges 0.09% a year, yields 1.08% and holds $15.1B in assets across 423 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, IWB charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.10% and holds $49.4B in assets across 1020 positions.

GSLC vs IWB — cost, income and size
MeasureGSLCIWB
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Dividend yield1.08%1.10%
Assets under management$15.1B$49.4B
Holdings4231020

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where GSLC and IWB trade against their own history

GSLC trades at 23.7 times earnings, against its own median of 20.6, and is more expensive than 80% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

IWB trades at 25.0 times earnings, against its own median of 21.3, and is more expensive than 83% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved GSLC and IWB this week

GSLC fell 1.2% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Meta Platforms (+6.1%) pushed the other way.

IWB fell 1.2% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

What do GSLC and IWB each hold?

What's inside GSLC: Tech 45%, Magnificent 7 32%.

36% of GSLC is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside IWB: Tech 44%, Magnificent 7 31%.

35% of IWB is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “GSLC vs IWB holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/gslc-vs-iwb

  1. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC)
  2. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB)

Register free to unlock GSLC vs IWB prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →