FQAL vs VT: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, FQAL and VT overlap 32.7% by weight. Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL): High-quality U.S. stocks. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT): Entire global stock market.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do FQAL and VT overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, FQAL and VT overlap 32.7% by weight.

95% of FQAL is already inside VT.

33% of VT is already inside FQAL.

FQAL holds 136 companies and VT holds 9,527; 132 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FQAL and VT?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FQAL 5.6 out of 10 and VT 5.5 out of 10.

They differ most on Quality: FQAL 9.8 and VT 7.4.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FQAL vs VT — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorFQALVT
Growth2.44.8
Valuation1.93.0
Risk8.15.9
Quality9.87.4
Return6.76.5

VT is the cheaper of the two at 0.06% a year

As of September 11, 2026, FQAL charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.28% and holds $1.4B in assets across 136 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, VT charges 0.06% a year, yields 1.68% and holds $97.9B in assets across 9527 positions.

FQAL vs VT — cost, income and size
MeasureFQALVT
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Dividend yield1.28%1.68%
Assets under management$1.4B$97.9B
Holdings1369527

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where FQAL and VT trade against their own history

FQAL trades at 24.9 times earnings, against its own median of 20.0, and is more expensive than 89% of its own 110 monthly readings since 2017.

VT trades at 20.7 times earnings, against its own median of 17.3, and is more expensive than 84% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved FQAL and VT this week

FQAL fell 1.7% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Palantir Technologies (−8.4%); Meta Platforms (+6.1%) pushed the other way.

VT fell 1.1% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Novartis (−15.2%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

What do FQAL and VT each hold?

What's inside FQAL: Tech 43%, Magnificent 7 27%.

40% of FQAL is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside VT: Tech 33%, Magnificent 7 20%.

22% of VT is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FQAL vs VT holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fqal-vs-vt

  1. Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL)
  2. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT)

Register free to unlock FQAL vs VT prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →